Judge Rebukes Trump Administration Over Deportation Defiance, Calls the Lawyers ‘Intemperate and Disrespectful’

Venezuelan migrants deported from the United States deplane at the Simon Bolivar International Airport in Maiquetia, Venezuela, Feb. 20, 2025.

A federal judge strongly criticized government lawyers for disregarding his orders by proceeding with the deportation of Venezuelan gang suspects despite a direct judicial directive to halt the process. Judge James Boasberg, who has served on the bench for 14 years, described the administration’s actions as “intemperate and disrespectful” and expressed deep concern over the treatment of his authority.

The case escalated after the Trump administration last weekend deported more than 200 Venezuelans to a prison facility in El Salvador immediately following President Trump’s proclamation that members of TdA could be removed under the Alien Enemies Act. The speed of the deportations raised suspicions, with the judge suggesting that it appeared to be an attempt to bypass judicial oversight. He questioned the urgency, stating that the only apparent reason for such rapid action was an awareness of potential legal complications.

The confrontation has grown into a significant constitutional dispute between the executive branch and the judiciary. President Trump responded to the judge’s intervention by calling for his impeachment and branding him “a radical left lunatic.” Judge Boasberg, in turn, voiced frustration over what he viewed as deliberate evasion of his orders. During a tense exchange, he pressed Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign about whether officials had been explicitly informed that it was a judicial order requiring planes to be turned around. Ensign acknowledged the intent of the directive but declined to disclose internal discussions, citing attorney-client privilege.

In a firm reprimand, the judge underscored concerns about the administration’s credibility and adherence to legal procedures. While affirming the president’s authority over foreign affairs and national security, he emphasized that individuals facing deportation must have an opportunity to challenge their classification under the Alien Enemies Act. He clarified that his ruling did not mandate the release of detainees into the U.S. and noted that deportations could still proceed under standard immigration laws. His decision specifically targeted the use of the Alien Enemies Act, a legal provision dating back to the 18th century.

With tensions mounting between the White House and the judiciary, the case is shaping into a broader battle over executive power and the rule of law.